Washington state regulators

The United States has filed to intervene in the European Union's regulatory decision concerning X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk. The move, reported by the Wall Street Journal, marks an unusual step by Washington into an EU enforcement matter. The intervention is likely to heighten tensions between the U.S. and Europe over digital regulation and platform governance.

The European Union says it will stand firm against Elon Musk's social media platform X after the United States backed a legal challenge to EU content rules. The dispute centers on the EU's Digital Services Act enforcement against X, and Brussels insists it will defend its regulatory authority in court despite Washington's intervention.

The European Union says it will stand firm in defending its position against X after the United States backed a legal challenge brought by Elon Musk against the bloc. The dispute centres on EU rules affecting the platform, and Washington's intervention has escalated what was already a tense standoff between Brussels and Musk. The case is being closely watched as a test of how far the EU's regulatory powers reach over major American tech companies.

US states are moving ahead of the federal government on regulating artificial intelligence safety, with state legislatures drafting and passing their own AI rules. The trend highlights a growing gap in Washington, where comprehensive AI legislation has stalled, leaving individual states to set standards on issues like transparency, bias and consumer protection.

Oregon's attorney general is urging Congress to establish federal guidelines for artificial intelligence. The appeal reflects growing concern among state officials that AI is developing faster than existing laws can handle, leaving consumers vulnerable to fraud, privacy violations and other harms. The call adds to pressure from state leaders for Washington to create a unified national regulatory framework.

U.S. Representative Jodey Arrington says the United States should err on the side of innovation when regulating artificial intelligence. His comments add to the ongoing debate in Washington over how heavily to police AI development, with lawmakers weighing competitive and economic concerns against calls for stricter safeguards.

MicroStrategy executive chairman Michael Saylor urged US policymakers to recognize Bitcoin rights at a policy summit in Washington, DC. His remarks add to an ongoing debate in the United States over how digital assets should be regulated and what protections holders should receive. The appeal has drawn attention across the cryptocurrency community, with observers weighing its implications for future US crypto legislation and the industry's growing presence in policy discussions.

Members of the American Feed Industry Association are calling on the US Congress to pass the PURR Act, legislation affecting the regulation of pet food. Industry advocates want federal standards to replace a patchwork of state-level rules, arguing the change would streamline approvals and give pet owners more product choices. The push highlights ongoing lobbying by the pet food sector over how its products are regulated in Washington.

Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, is calling for a treaty between the United States and China to rein in the risks of advanced artificial intelligence, as President Donald Trump prepares to meet technology and AI executives in Washington. The proposal raises questions about whether Chinese AI companies could be slowed by international agreements, and lands amid ongoing debate in Congress over how the US should compete with and regulate AI development alongside Beijing.