Apple Pay

A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in its devices. The award is being described as one of the largest of its kind in a US patent case, and the verdict puts Apple's use of the technology under scrutiny.

Apple has been ordered to pay $5.7 billion in a patent infringement verdict relating to the haptic feedback technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch. The ruling, one of the largest patent judgments against the company, is expected to prompt an appeal and could affect how Apple sources vibration components for its flagship devices.

A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in iPhones and other devices. The verdict is being called one of the largest patent damages awards against Apple, and attention is now turning to whether the company will appeal.

Banks and credit unions are preparing to join forces against the fees associated with Apple Pay, as an antitrust lawsuit over Apple's payment practices advances. The move signals growing resistance from financial institutions to the cut Apple takes on tap-to-pay transactions, with the case likely to shape how mobile wallet fees are structured in the United States.

Banks and credit unions are reportedly banding together to push back against the fees they say Apple charges through Apple Pay, as an antitrust lawsuit over the practice moves forward. The legal challenge targets the commission structure Apple imposes on card issuers for transactions made with its payment service. The outcome could reshape how banks and mobile wallet providers split revenue on contactless payments in the United States.

A US jury has ordered Apple to pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent awards in US history and may prompt an appeal, while reigniting debate over patent litigation against major technology companies.

A news headline reports that Apple has been ordered to pay $5.7 billion following a patent infringement verdict involving technology used in its iPhones and Apple Watches. The evidence consists only of this single headline from a law commentary source, with no post discussions, reactions, or additional details about the case, the plaintiff, or the court. People appear to be sharing or reading the news, but what they are saying about it is not clear from the available posts.

Banks and credit unions are joining forces to challenge fees tied to Apple Pay, as an antitrust lawsuit against Apple over its payment practices advances. The case targets the fees Apple charges card issuers for access to its tap-to-pay system, and the move signals growing resistance from financial institutions to what they view as unjustified charges.

Apple is paying out $250 million to settle a lawsuit over iPhone features tied to artificial intelligence, and claims are now open. Consumers eligible for compensation can file through the official claims process, with guides from outlets like CNET explaining eligibility, deadlines and step-by-step filing instructions. The settlement applies to iPhone owners affected by the disputed AI-related features, and payments will be distributed once claims are reviewed and approved.

A first-generation iPhone, still sealed in its original packaging, has sold at auction for more than $190,000. The price far exceeds the phone's original 2007 retail value of $499, underlining how collectors are willing to pay premiums for pristine vintage technology. The sale adds to a string of high prices for unopened Apple products in recent collector auctions.

Banks and credit unions are reportedly joining forces to push back against the fees Apple charges for its Apple Pay service. The move signals growing resistance among financial institutions to the cut Apple takes on card transactions. The story is drawing attention and debate among technology and finance commentators.