regulators

Anthropic and OpenAI, two of the leading artificial intelligence companies, are publicly warning about the risks of advanced AI while simultaneously working to influence how the technology will be regulated. The story, widely picked up by US broadcasters and the AP, frames the companies as both sounding the alarm and seeking a hand in shaping the rules that will govern their own industry.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. His comments come as governments worldwide struggle to coordinate rules for rapidly advancing AI technology, with some comparing the challenge to historic superpower diplomacy over nuclear weapons.

Executives from Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning that advanced AI systems could pose risks to humanity, while simultaneously pushing to influence how the technology will be governed. Critics and observers are asking what the companies stand to gain from sounding the alarm, with some suggesting the warnings double as a bid for regulatory influence in a field the firms themselves dominate.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have appealed to the United Nations to establish oversight of the technology they helped create, warning of risks to humanity. The call puts pressure on international bodies, including the UN Security Council, to move faster on global AI governance as the technology advances.

Bill Gates warned that negotiating a global framework for artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argued that AI involves far more actors, commercial interests and rapid technological change, making international agreement harder to reach than it was for nuclear weapons controls.

China is considering allowing major tech firms ByteDance and Alibaba to buy Nvidia's newest chips, according to The Information. The decision would signal a shift in Beijing's stance on US semiconductor access, as Chinese regulators have previously pressed domestic companies to favour local chips amid ongoing US-China technology restrictions.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreements on artificial intelligence will prove harder than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. He argues AI is developing faster and more diffusely than nuclear weapons technology, involving companies as well as states, making global regulation more difficult to coordinate. The comments add to ongoing debate about how governments should oversee rapidly advancing AI systems.

Bloomberg Originals has published a feature examining how India's retail day traders collectively lost billions of rupees in the country's fast-growing derivatives and intraday markets. The report looks at the scale of losses among small individual traders, who make up a large share of trading volume on Indian exchanges, and the forces behind their poor returns.

Bill Gates said that reaching global cooperation on artificial intelligence is 'more difficult' than negotiating agreements over nuclear weapons. The billionaire Microsoft co-founder argued that AI development is driven by many competing companies and countries, making coordination on safety and oversight more complicated than past arms control efforts. His remarks add to an ongoing debate among tech leaders and governments about how to regulate rapidly advancing AI technology.

Bill Gates has called on governments to put safeguards around the development of artificial intelligence. His comments add a prominent tech voice to the growing debate over whether AI should be regulated and how governments should respond to its rapid advance.

Bill Gates said creating a global framework for artificial intelligence would be more difficult to achieve than the nuclear arms limitations agreed during the Cold War. He argued that AI's rapid spread across commercial and civilian sectors makes international coordination far more complex than controlling weapons programs run by states. His comments come as governments worldwide debate how to regulate increasingly powerful AI systems.

Bill Gates said that getting countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence is more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. He argued that AI competition, particularly between the United States and China, makes international coordination on safety and regulation harder to achieve. His remarks add to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how to manage AI risks globally.

Bill Gates says that simply having an emergency 'kill switch' to shut down advanced artificial intelligence would not be enough to manage the technology's risks. His comments feed into a wider debate among tech leaders, researchers and regulators over how to keep increasingly powerful AI systems safe and under meaningful human control.

Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, is set to have dinner with President Donald Trump at the White House. The meeting brings together a leading figure in artificial intelligence with an administration that has been actively shaping US policy on AI regulation and development. Observers are watching for what the encounter could signal about the tech industry's relationship with the government.

A divide has emerged between United Nations bodies and Washington policymakers over how artificial intelligence should be governed, with leaders offering competing visions for oversight of the fast-moving technology. The disagreement highlights ongoing international tension over whether AI regulation should be coordinated globally or shaped primarily by national interests and domestic policy priorities.

Bill Gates says reaching international cooperation on artificial intelligence will be harder than nuclear arms negotiations were during the Cold War. He argues that competing commercial incentives make AI agreements more difficult to broker than weapons treaties. His remarks add to a growing debate over how governments should coordinate on AI safety and regulation across borders.

President Donald Trump said he met with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and again played down concerns about artificial intelligence. The confirmation puts the White House's relationship with one of the leading AI firms in focus, with Trump repeating his view that alarm over the technology is overstated. Observers are watching for signals on future US AI policy and regulation.

Questions are being raised about whether advanced AI systems could help people develop biological weapons, and how serious that risk actually is. The debate touches on whether AI models could provide meaningful uplift for bioweapons, what safeguards labs and companies should put in place, and how regulators should respond. Experts remain divided, with some warning of catastrophic potential and others calling current fears overstated.

Ireland's Data Protection Commission has fined Google €403 million for violations of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation. The decision makes Google one of the companies hit hardest by European privacy enforcement and is likely to fuel ongoing debate about how major technology firms handle users' personal data and whether regulators' penalties are a sufficient deterrent.

Major urban centres across Europe are struggling with a housing shortage that has become an explosive social issue. Cities are now exploring different policy models to expand affordable housing, with approaches ranging from public construction programmes to rent regulations being tested across the continent. A Deutsche Welle report examines which models are being put in place and how they aim to ease the pressure on residents.

Nvidia's newly developed AI chips could be cleared for sale in the Chinese market, according to a report from MarketScreener. The potential move would mark a significant development in the ongoing tug-of-war between US export controls and China's demand for advanced semiconductors. Details about which chips are involved, under what conditions, and whether regulators on either side would approve the arrangement remain unspecified.

Bill Gates is calling on the US Congress to write artificial intelligence safeguards into law, arguing that lawmakers should establish rules for how the technology is developed and used. The appeal adds the Microsoft co-founder's voice to the growing debate in Washington over regulating AI, where legislators are weighing how to address risks without stifling innovation.

Cities across Europe are searching for new ways to increase the supply of affordable housing as rents and property prices strain household budgets. The topic, reported by German broadcaster Deutsche Welle, reflects a wider debate among urban policymakers about construction, regulation and public investment. Housing affordability has become a pressing political issue in many major European cities.

India's space sector is opening up to private companies, and a wave of startups is now developing rockets, satellites and launch services alongside the state-run Indian Space Research Organisation. Coverage is asking whether these young firms can scale fast enough to make India one of the world's leading space powers. Supporters point to successful launches and lower costs; questions remain over funding, regulation and competition with established players.

Donald Trump said he would have dinner with Anthropic's chief executive as the debate over artificial intelligence intensifies in Washington and beyond. The planned meeting draws attention to the growing contact between AI industry leaders and political figures, with observers watching for signals about how policy on AI regulation and development may shift.

Big Tech is betting its next wave of growth on smart glasses and AI-powered gadgets, but the products face mounting privacy challenges. Always-on cameras and microphones, combined with AI analysis of everything users see and hear, are drawing scrutiny from regulators and the public over surveillance risks and data collection.

Bill Gates says establishing global safeguards for artificial intelligence will be more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argues that unlike nuclear weapons, which were controlled by a small number of state actors, AI is being developed rapidly by competing companies and countries worldwide, making international agreement far harder to reach. The comparison has drawn wide coverage across multiple outlets and renewed debate over how AI development should be governed globally.

Health authorities are investigating a salmonella outbreak that has again been linked to tomatoes from Italy. The recurrence of the contamination issue has raised concerns about food safety controls in the supply chain and prompted attention from food safety regulators and consumers across Europe.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, argues in a Le Monde interview that artificial intelligence is ultimately software and can therefore be controlled. He is pushing back against fears that advanced AI is an uncontrollable force, framing the technology as something that can be governed and regulated like any other software.

Walmart says neither the company nor its AI shopping assistant uses customers' personal information to set prices, pushing back on concerns about personalized or surveillance-based pricing at the retail giant. The statement comes amid growing scrutiny of how retailers deploy AI tools and shopper data. It remains unclear whether regulators or consumer groups are investigating the practice.

China is considering measures to make open-weight artificial intelligence models less dangerous as risks from the technology grow, according to the South China Morning Post. The discussion focuses on how freely available model weights could be misused, and what safeguards Beijing might apply. The report comes amid intensifying global debate over regulating powerful AI systems.

Manchester City's verdicts in its legal dispute with the Premier League are being scrutinised well beyond England, with clubs, pundits and fans worldwide weighing in on what the outcome means for competitive balance and financial rules. The New York Times has gathered reactions from across the football world, reflecting how the case is being read as a test of how top-flight regulation is enforced internationally.

Elon Musk is locked in a €120 million legal fight with the European Union, and the United States government is now seeking to insert itself into the case. The dispute involves EU regulatory action against Musk's businesses, and Washington's decision to weigh in escalates what was already a high-profile clash between one of the world's richest men and European regulators.