immigration court

A group of immigrants has asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries they have no connection to. The emergency appeal asks the justices to preserve protections while litigation over the removal policy continues, in a test of how far the administration can go in carrying out its aggressive immigration enforcement agenda.

Across the United States, people have been showing up in immigration courtrooms to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining people at hearings. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun, whose presence supporters say can influence outcomes, since faith leaders standing beside defendants has been shown to affect how cases proceed. The practice has spread as a form of peaceful accompaniment.

A federal judge, Trump appointee Stephanie Gallagher, has held the Trump administration in contempt for deporting a man to El Salvador in violation of three court orders. The judge is ordering the government to return him. The ruling, reported by Politico legal correspondent Kyle Cheney, is drawing attention as part of the broader legal fight over the administration's immigration enforcement and compliance with court rulings.

A federal judge has blocked a Trump-era immigration rule that restricted eligibility for federally funded programs. The ruling stops the rule from being enforced while legal challenges proceed. Critics of the rule had argued it unfairly limited access to services for immigrant families, while supporters said it protected public resources. The decision is part of a broader wave of litigation over immigration policies introduced during the Trump administration.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

Donald Trump reacted with frustration after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad' about the decision, and is now pushing legislation in Congress to end the practice. The comments renew a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which critics say guarantees citizenship to anyone born on US soil, and set up a fresh legislative battle over immigration policy.

A judge has ordered the Canadian government to release confidential records about Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada after the Second World War. The ruling could shed light on how hundreds of war criminals were allowed into the country and why their files remained sealed for decades, reviving debate over Canada's postwar immigration record and official secrecy.

A Cuban man has spent a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is now being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on detention authority. The report examines how federal immigration authorities have held him long-term despite legal questions about the limits of that power. His situation highlights the ongoing tension between immigration enforcement practices and constitutional limits on prolonged detention.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit court to strike down a drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized recording immigration enforcement agents from the air. The group argues the restriction blocks lawful First Amendment activity by preventing aerial documentation of immigration operations. The case is drawing attention from civil liberties advocates concerned about oversight of federal immigration agents.

The Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to proceed with an overhaul of its immigration database ahead of the midterm elections, over the dissents of the Court's liberal justices. The decision lifts a block on the DHS plan, which critics warn could affect immigration records used in voter-related checks, while supporters argue it is a routine modernization effort.

Immigrants' rights advocates, including the Asian Law Caucus, have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new executive order from President Trump on birthright citizenship. The suit argues the order is unlawful and targets efforts to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. Legal battles over the order are expected to move quickly through the courts.

The Supreme Court has reinstated a federal immigration database, a decision arriving just ahead of the November election. Attention is now turning to whether Arizona officials will deploy the database, a state long at the center of immigration enforcement battles. Observers are weighing how the ruling could affect state-level checks and enforcement practices, and what role immigration policy will play in campaign debates heading into the vote.

US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.

A federal judge has issued a permanent injunction barring ICE from detaining immigrants at 26 Federal Plaza in New York, finding the practice unconstitutional. The ruling ends a contested detention operation at the Manhattan federal building and marks a significant legal setback for the agency's expanded immigration enforcement in the city.

A judge has ruled that immigrants in Wisconsin can continue using community clinics, Head Start programs and adult education services, halting an effort to restrict their access. Multiple Wisconsin outlets report the decision, which preserves federal and state-funded services for immigrant families. Supporters see it as protecting families and children, while it marks a setback for officials attempting tighter limits.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is campaigning for a US Senate seat, making immigration a central theme of his campaign appearances. He also faced questions over a controversial plea deal tied to his long-running securities fraud case, drawing scrutiny as he courts Republican primary voters.

A member of Congress was denied access to a new, secretive immigration courtroom in Manhattan, according to a report from TheDailyNewsOnline.com. The refusal to allow congressional oversight of an immigration facility is expected to fuel criticism about transparency in immigration court proceedings and how migrants' cases are being handled in New York City. Details about who blocked the visit and why have not yet been made public.