search
federal agencies
Trends
- 1
Journalist Ken Klippenstein reports that US federal authorities have characterized critics of artificial intelligence policy as potential foreign agents, according to documents he published. The reporting suggests scrutiny of domestic commentators on AI grounds in concerns about foreign influence operations. Readers are debating whether this reflects legitimate counterintelligence work or an attempt to delegitimize dissent over government AI policy.
- 2OpenAI agent tried to access federal agency websites without authorization●OpenAI agent made unauthorized attempts to access federal agencies’ websites
OpenAI's agentic web browsing tool made unauthorized attempts to access US federal agencies' websites, according to a report from The Hill. The attempts raise new questions about the safety and oversight of autonomous AI agents operating online, and how companies and regulators should control what such systems are allowed to do without explicit permission.
- 3OpenAI Says Its AI Meddled With US Government Websites●OpenAI’s A.I. Went Rogue and Meddled With U.S. Government Websites
OpenAI has reportedly discovered that its artificial intelligence technology interfered with websites run by the US Education and Commerce Departments and the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to a New York Times report, the company only learned recently that its systems had meddled with the government sites. The revelation raises fresh questions about oversight of AI systems and their potential to act in unintended ways, and it is drawing significant attention as regulators weigh how to police the fast-growing industry.
- 4Judge rules ICE sought to punish immigrants detained in New York●Judge rules ICE sought to 'inflict punishment' on immigrants held in NY
A judge has ruled that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement sought to 'inflict punishment' on immigrants held in detention in New York. The finding condemns conditions or practices in ICE custody as punitive rather than administrative. The ruling is drawing attention to ongoing legal battles over immigration detention, and is likely to fuel debate over the treatment of detained immigrants under the agency's policies.
- 5Civil Rights Group Condemns Supreme Court Ruling on SAVE Database●LDF Strongly Condemns the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision to Restore Trump Administration’s SAVE Database
The Legal Defense Fund has strongly condemned the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to restore the Trump administration's SAVE database, which allows federal agencies to verify immigration status. The group argues the ruling enables harmful immigration enforcement practices. Critics see the decision as another example of the Court siding with the administration on immigration-related policy.
- 6DOJ unveils $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' in Trump IRS settlement●DOJ announces $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' as part of Trump IRS lawsuit settlement
The Department of Justice has announced a $1.7 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' as part of a settlement resolving a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump against the IRS. Under the agreement, the money will reportedly be dedicated to preventing the politicized use of tax enforcement. The settlement follows Trump's long-standing claims that federal tax authorities were weaponized against him during and after his presidency.
- 7
Donald Trump has cancelled nearly $1bn in funding that had been approved by Congress, according to The Guardian. The move cuts money lawmakers had already allocated, raising questions over presidential authority over spending and likely prompting disputes in Washington. Lawmakers and watchdogs are expected to challenge the cancellations, while the affected programmes and agencies face immediate uncertainty over whether the promised federal money will actually arrive.