search
US federal courts
Trends
- 1US judge overturns Trump's White House media ban▼US judge overturns President Trump's White House media ban | BBC News
A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban on certain media outlets from White House coverage. The ruling blocks the administration from excluding journalists from presidential events, a move critics called an attack on press freedom. Supporters of the president are expected to challenge the decision, and the case is likely to move through the appeals courts, keeping the fight over media access in the spotlight.
- 2Supreme Court lets states use SAVE database for citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows state officials to cross-check voter registration records against the immigration database, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Critics argue such checks risk wrongly purging eligible voters, particularly naturalised citizens, while supporters frame the ruling as a victory for election integrity.
- 3
The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.
- 4Supreme Court backs federal citizenship tool for voter checks▼Supreme Court OKs use of federal citizenship tool to vet voters, but midterm impact will be limited
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.
- 5
The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.
- 6Trump asks Supreme Court to allow limit on trans inmate care▼Trump asks Supreme Court to allow limit on care for trans inmates
The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.
- 7CNN, Politico and MS NOW sue to block Trump's press ban●CNN, MS NOW and Politico ask judge to stop Trump from reviving White House ban
CNN, MS NOW and Politico have asked a federal judge to stop President Trump from reviving a ban on their reporters' access to the White House. The news organisations are seeking a court order to preserve their access, arguing the move restricts press freedom. The dispute reopens a running battle between the administration and major US news outlets over media access.
- 8Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Allow Denying Hormones to Trans Inmates●Trump Administration Asks Justices to Allow It to Deny Hormones to Trans Inmates
The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it deny hormone therapy to transgender inmates in federal custody. The request escalates a legal fight over medical care for transgender prisoners, pitting claims of institutional discretion and public cost against court rulings that withholding such treatment violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices' response will shape how far correctional authorities must go in providing gender-affirming care behind bars.
- 9Court rules Kalshi sports bets not swaps, states may regulate●Another court rules Kalshi sports bets aren’t “swaps,” says states can crack down
A US court has ruled that Kalshi's sports event contracts do not qualify as "swaps" under federal commodities law, rejecting the prediction-market platform's argument that it answers only to federal regulators. The decision means individual states can enforce their own gambling laws against Kalshi's sports wagering products, a significant setback in the company's expanding legal battles across the country.
- 10Trump administration faces contempt charge over Venezuela deportations▼Trump administration facing indictment for contempt after deporting Venezuelans to El Salvador
The Trump administration is facing a potential criminal contempt referral after deporting Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador despite a court order blocking the removals. The case centres on whether officials defied judicial instructions when flights carrying Venezuelans landed in El Salvador, setting up a confrontation between the White House and the federal courts over presidential authority on immigration.
- 11Court rules against Kalshi on state regulation of prediction markets▼Court rules against Kalshi, says states can regulate prediction markets
A US court has ruled against prediction market operator Kalshi, holding that states retain the authority to regulate prediction markets operating within their borders. The decision is a setback for Kalshi's expansion strategy, which has relied on federal oversight of event contracts. It may prompt further legal fights over whether prediction markets fall under federal or state gambling and derivatives law.