US courts

The Dutch government is preparing for potentially devastating US sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court, which is headquartered in The Hague. The measures, linked to the Trump administration's objections to the court's work, including its Israel-related cases, could disrupt the tribunal's operations and its banking and diplomatic support in the Netherlands.

The US Supreme Court has invalidated most of the tariffs imposed under President Trump, according to ABC News. The ruling strikes at the core of the administration's trade policy, which used sweeping import duties as a central economic and political tool. Details of the court's reasoning and the administration's response are not yet available.

Immigrants involved in a legal challenge have asked the US Supreme Court to keep in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The request asks the justices to leave the current protections intact while litigation continues. The dispute forms part of a broader legal fight over the administration's immigration and removal policies.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows state officials to cross-check voter registration records against the immigration database, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Critics argue such checks risk wrongly purging eligible voters, particularly naturalised citizens, while supporters frame the ruling as a victory for election integrity.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to the New York Times. The decision removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate policy, raising questions about how the remaining eight justices might divide and why the recusal came so late.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the initial reports. His absence could affect the outcome, as the remaining eight justices may split on an issue that has previously divided the Court along ideological lines.

Major US news organizations are asking a federal court to block the White House from enforcing a ban that restricts their access to the president and press events. The legal challenge escalates a fight over press freedom and whether the administration can punish outlets for their coverage. The case is drawing attention to how far a president can go in controlling which journalists get access.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has reversed course and stepped aside from a major climate case, removing himself from the panel that would decide the dispute. No detailed explanation accompanied the announcement. The move could affect the outcome, since an eighth justice participating raises the odds of a 4-4 split, and it comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the justices' ethics and potential conflicts of interest.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his oil stock holdings. The move comes after questions were raised about whether his financial interests in oil companies created a conflict of interest in the litigation. The withdrawal could affect the outcome of a closely watched climate dispute, and it has intensified debate over ethics rules and disclosure standards for Supreme Court justices.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri for the third time. The repeated interventions mark another clash over redistricting in the state, where GOP lawmakers have sought to redraw district boundaries. Details of the court's reasoning and the map's next steps were not immediately available.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case before the court. The decision removes one justice from a ruling that could shape how climate-related claims are handled in the United States, and observers are watching closely for what his absence means for the outcome.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

A court case involving Pepsi could change how judges assess the strength of trademarks in US law, with potential consequences for how businesses protect their brands. The dispute raises questions about the legal standards used to determine whether a mark is strong enough to merit broad protection against infringement.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the pending case brought by Colorado municipalities against energy company Suncor over climate-related damages. The case tests whether state consumer-protection and nuisance claims against fossil fuel producers belong in state courts. With only eight justices participating, the outcome could end in a 4-4 split, leaving lower-court rulings in place.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional map for the third time, halting the gerrymandered district boundaries from taking effect while challenges continue. The repeated interventions keep Missouri's current congressional seats in place for now. The ruling is drawing attention from voting rights advocates and state officials locked in a dispute over partisan redistricting in the state.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine says the state will hold prediction-market platform Kalshi accountable for operating illegally, following a court ruling in the case. The move signals a continued state crackdown on the company's sports-event contract offerings, which regulators argue amount to unlicensed gambling. The enforcement effort is drawing attention as part of a wider legal battle over Kalshi's operations across US states.

The Netherlands is building an alternative software ecosystem based on NixOS after US sanctions on the International Criminal Court effectively ruled out Microsoft products for Dutch government use. Trial programs are already running, with a first release expected at the end of 2027. The move highlights how American sanctions are prompting European governments to reconsider dependence on US software vendors.

US sanctions on the International Criminal Court, based in The Hague, have cut the court off from American software, prompting the Netherlands to begin moving away from Microsoft products. Dutch authorities are running trial programs for a NixOS-based alternative software ecosystem, with a first release targeted for the end of 2027. The move is being closely watched as a test case for European digital sovereignty.

The Supreme Court will take up the question of whether judges have the power to extend voting hours, but only after the November election. The timing means any ruling will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, and the case is being closely watched given recurring litigation over polling hours and Election Day disruptions in contested states.

The US Supreme Court is considering a set of high-profile cases covering the government's authority to detain immigrants, gambling-related disputes, and displays of the Ten Commandments. Reuters reported the court is mulling these matters as part of its docket. The combination touches on immigration policy, gaming regulation and religion in public life, drawing broad interest.

The US Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration in a case involving its voter database, though the ruling is a narrow one with limited scope. The decision hands the administration a victory on election-data collection, but the Court's reasoning constrains how far the win extends, leaving broader questions about voter-roll access unresolved.