UPR

The US Supreme Court has invalidated most of the tariffs imposed under President Trump, according to ABC News. The ruling strikes at the core of the administration's trade policy, which used sweeping import duties as a central economic and political tool. Details of the court's reasoning and the administration's response are not yet available.

Immigrants involved in a legal challenge have asked the US Supreme Court to keep in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The request asks the justices to leave the current protections intact while litigation continues. The dispute forms part of a broader legal fight over the administration's immigration and removal policies.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states can use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states run voter rolls against the immigration-status system, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Supporters argue it protects election integrity, while critics warn it could wrongly purge eligible voters and raises privacy and accuracy concerns about the database.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court. The recusal means only eight justices will weigh in on the outcome, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave a lower court ruling in place. Recusals by Supreme Court justices are rare and typically stem from conflicts of interest.

During a Supreme Court hearing in India, judges examined the Election Commission's independence, with the observation that being independent is not enough — the Commission must also be seen as independent. The remarks have sparked discussion about the appointment process and public trust in India's electoral body.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case scheduled for next week, according to CNBC. The court is expected to hear arguments without him, which could affect the outcome if the justices divide closely. No reason for his recusal has been given in the report, and the case is being closely watched for its implications on climate regulation.

Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major Supreme Court case dealing with climate change, according to Politico. The withdrawal leaves the justices potentially split on a dispute with far-reaching consequences for US climate policy. Reasons for the recusal were not given, and it remains unclear how the rest of the court will rule.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change. The Wall Street Journal reported the decision, though no reason for his recusal has been given. His absence could affect the outcome, since the remaining eight justices may split evenly on the issue.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a lower court's block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, reportedly related to housing requirements. The emergency request puts the disputed policy before the nation's highest court while litigation continues in lower courts. The move is drawing attention as part of the administration's broader legal battles over transgender-related policies.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

The Bernalillo County Clerk in New Mexico says mail-in ballot operations are proceeding on schedule after the Supreme Court ruled against a White House plan related to election procedures. The ruling removes uncertainty that could have disrupted ballot handling in the county, and local officials confirm preparations for upcoming elections remain unchanged.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri for the third time. The repeated interventions mark another clash over redistricting in the state, where GOP lawmakers have sought to redraw district boundaries. Details of the court's reasoning and the map's next steps were not immediately available.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional map for the third time, halting the gerrymandered district boundaries from taking effect while challenges continue. The repeated interventions keep Missouri's current congressional seats in place for now. The ruling is drawing attention from voting rights advocates and state officials locked in a dispute over partisan redistricting in the state.

The US Supreme Court has issued a major ruling announced on a Friday night, a timing that immediately drew attention because late-week releases often accompany contentious decisions. Commentators and legal observers are reacting to the decision, with the dramatic framing of the news fueling wide discussion about what the ruling means and its potential impact.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a pending climate case before the Court, according to a news report. The move means only eight justices will consider the matter, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No detailed explanation for the recusal was given in the report, and reaction so far has focused on what his absence could mean for the outcome.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves the justices potentially split eight ways on a dispute with significant implications for US climate policy. No detailed reason for the recusal has been widely reported, and observers are watching closely to see how the case will proceed without him.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves eight justices to hear the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No reason for the recusal was given, and the development is drawing attention to how the vacancy-free but shorthanded bench may handle one of its most consequential environmental rulings.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate-related case involving oil companies, according to an announcement carried by US media. His recusal means the case will be heard by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. No detailed explanation for his decision not to participate was given in the report.

Energy industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case that could shield oil companies from climate-related lawsuits. According to Vox, the request is being described as audacious, with critics saying the industry is seeking to escape accountability in state courts where dozens of cities and states are suing over climate damages.

The US Supreme Court is beginning its new term with several critical election-related cases potentially on its docket. Election law watchers say the justices could take up disputes over voting rules and election administration ahead of upcoming contests, with decisions likely to shape how future elections are run. Advocacy and legal groups are watching closely to see which cases the Court agrees to hear.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling in favor of President Trump in a case involving a voter database, according to early reports. Details of the decision and its legal reasoning remain limited, and it is not yet clear what the ruling means for voter data access, election administration, or related disputes moving forward.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the Suncor climate liability case, according to Bloomberg Law. The case involves claims against oil company Suncor over climate change damages. Without stating a reason, the recusal reduces the Court to eight justices for the matter and follows earlier recusals in similar oil industry climate cases.