search
Justice For All
Trends
- 1Immigrants ask Supreme Court to block deportations to third countries▼Immigrants ask Supreme Court to leave ruling in place preventing Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries
Immigrants involved in a legal challenge have asked the US Supreme Court to keep in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The request asks the justices to leave the current protections intact while litigation continues. The dispute forms part of a broader legal fight over the administration's immigration and removal policies.
- 2UN roundup: US migration policy, refugee funding, world forests▼World News in Brief: Refugee funding, US migration policy triggers ‘cascade’ of rights violations, world forests report, restorative justice in Colombia
A UN news roundup highlights US migration policies triggering what officials call a cascade of human rights violations, alongside warnings over funding shortfalls for refugee programmes. The brief also covers a new global report on the state of the world's forests and progress on restorative justice efforts in Colombia as the country continues dealing with the legacy of its armed conflict.
- 3Sudan death row inmates allege torture and secret trials▼Sudan death row inmates allege torture, secret trials in anti-RSF sweep
Prisoners sentenced to death in Sudan say they were tortured and tried in secret as part of the government's sweeping crackdown on supporters of the Rapid Support Forces. The allegations, reported by Sudan Tribune, raise concerns about due process in mass prosecutions linked to the country's civil war.
- 4Justice Alito Recuses from Supreme Court Climate Change Case▼Justice Alito will no longer participate in climate change dispute
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change dispute before the Court, according to SCOTUSblog. His withdrawal means the case will be heard by eight justices, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place without setting a national precedent. Alito has not publicly detailed his reasons, and the development comes as the Court's docket features several high-stakes environmental cases.
- 5Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate case▼Alito recuses from major climate change case to be decided by the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the initial reports. His absence could affect the outcome, as the remaining eight justices may split on an issue that has previously divided the Court along ideological lines.
- 6Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate Case●Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate-Change Case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to the New York Times. The decision removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate policy, raising questions about how the remaining eight justices might divide and why the recusal came so late.
- 7Sudan Chemical Weapons Allegations Move to International Justice▼Sudan’s Chemical Weapons Allegations Face International Justice
Allegations that chemical weapons were used in Sudan are being pushed toward international justice mechanisms, according to regional coverage. The reports suggest the issue has moved beyond accusation into a potential legal process, though details on which bodies are involved and what evidence has been submitted remain thin. Sudan has previously denied such claims, and the situation adds to scrutiny of the country amid its ongoing civil war.
- 8Justice Alito recuses himself from major climate case▼In reversal, Justice Samuel Alito steps aside from major climate case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has reversed course and stepped aside from a major climate case, removing himself from the panel that would decide the dispute. No detailed explanation accompanied the announcement. The move could affect the outcome, since an eighth justice participating raises the odds of a 4-4 split, and it comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the justices' ethics and potential conflicts of interest.
- 9Justice Alito to sit out Supreme Court climate case▼Supreme Court Justice Alito will not participate in big climate change case next week
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case scheduled for next week, according to CNBC. The court is expected to hear arguments without him, which could affect the outcome if the justices divide closely. No reason for his recusal has been given in the report, and the case is being closely watched for its implications on climate regulation.
- 10Germany backs ICC after US sanctions the court▼German Foreign Minister supports ICC after Trump administration imposes sanctions on the Court
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.
- 11US data firm accused of Russian ties served EU projects●"A U.S.-based data-extraction firm accused of being secretly run from Russia has worked on EU-backed projects and sold i
Oxygen Forensics, a data-extraction firm presented as US-based, has been accused of being secretly run from Russia. According to documents seen by POLITICO, the company worked on EU-backed projects and sold its services to European law enforcement agencies. The US Justice Department last week charged the firm, raising questions about how it gained access to European police and public contracts.
- 12Justice Alito Recuses Himself From Major Climate Case▼Samuel Alito steps aside in a major climate case amid scrutiny over oil stock holdings
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his oil stock holdings. The move comes after questions were raised about whether his financial interests in oil companies created a conflict of interest in the litigation. The withdrawal could affect the outcome of a closely watched climate dispute, and it has intensified debate over ethics rules and disclosure standards for Supreme Court justices.
- 13Justice Alito Recuses Himself from Supreme Court Climate Case▼Justice Alito Won’t Participate in Supreme Court Case on Climate Change
Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to the Wall Street Journal. His recusal leaves the remaining eight justices to decide the matter, potentially raising the chances of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for his withdrawal from the case was given in the report.
- 14Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate case▼Alito bows out of blockbuster Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.
- 15Trump plan to weaken Endangered Species Act echoes Scalia dissent●Trump's sneaky plan to gut Endangered Species Act draws from 1995 Scalia dissent
The Trump administration is pursuing changes that would significantly weaken the Endangered Species Act, and the legal approach draws heavily on a 1995 dissent written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The strategy relies on Scalia's narrow reading of the law's protections, allowing the government to scale back habitat safeguards without new legislation. Environmental advocates warn the move could strip protections from threatened wildlife across the United States.
- 16Justice Department Charges 12 People Over Election Crimes▼Justice Department Announces Charges and Guilty Pleas Involving 12 Individuals for Election Crimes
The US Department of Justice has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals for election-related crimes. The announcement was made via the department's official website, though details of the specific offenses, the defendants' identities and the sentences involved have not yet been widely circulated. The case comes amid ongoing national scrutiny of election integrity and enforcement of voting laws.
- 17Colombia praised for landmark restorative justice measures▼Colombia landmark restorative justice steps
Colombia is being highlighted for taking landmark steps in restorative justice, a development noted by the UN human rights office. The measures are seen as part of the country's ongoing efforts to address past atrocities through reconciliation rather than pure punishment. Observers view the moves as significant for transitional justice in the region, though details of the specific steps and reactions remain limited.
- 18Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate case▼Justice Samuel Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.
- 19Justice Alito recuses from pivotal Supreme Court climate case▼Alito will not participate in pivotal climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case before the court. The decision removes one justice from a ruling that could shape how climate-related claims are handled in the United States, and observers are watching closely for what his absence means for the outcome.
- 20Court Strikes Down Trump Election Conditions on Anti-Terrorism Funding▼Trump Administration’s Election Conditions on Anti-Terrorism Funding Struck Down
A federal court has struck down conditions imposed by the Trump administration that tied anti-terrorism funding to election-related demands. The Brennan Center for Justice highlighted the ruling, which blocks the administration from leveraging security grants to influence how elections are run. Critics had argued the conditions amounted to improper federal pressure on state election administration.
- 21Ex-White House election official exits DOJ probe of Trump critics▼Ex-White House election official leaves DOJ probe of Trump foes, sources say
A former White House election official has left or been removed from the Justice Department investigation targeting critics of Donald Trump, sources told Reuters. The development raises new questions about staffing and direction of the probe into alleged politicisation of the department. Details about the official's departure and the reasons behind it remain limited, with sources speaking on condition of anonymity.
- 22Justice Department says Russians plotted to kill dissident in US●Russians allegedly planned to kill dissident in US, DOJ says
The US Department of Justice alleges Russian operatives planned to assassinate a dissident on American soil, according to reports from ABC News. The announcement has drawn attention to the reach of Russian intelligence operations inside the United States and follows earlier US warnings about plots against critics of the Kremlin living abroad.
- 23Alito Recuses from Climate Case Amid Timing Questions▼Alito’s Recusal From Climate Case: Too Little, Too Late?
Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a climate-related case before the Supreme Court, prompting debate over whether the move came too late. Commentators are questioning why the recusal was not announced earlier and what it means for the case's outcome and for public confidence in the Court's handling of conflicts of interest.
- 24
New U.S. sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being described as a threat to European sovereignty. The measures could complicate cooperation between European states and the Hague-based court, raising concerns in Europe about the reach of American sanctions policy and the future of international justice institutions.
- 25Justice Alito sits out Supreme Court climate case against oil companies▼US Supreme Court's Alito won't participate in climate case involving oil companies
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.
- 26Justice Alito Recuses from Major Supreme Court Climate Case▼Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.
- 27Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate Case▼Alito recuses himself days before major climate-change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.
- 28
The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.
- 29Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate case●In reversal, Justice Samuel Alito steps aside from major climate case Alito will sit out the first case the Supreme Cour
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.
- 30Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate lawsuits case▼Alito recuses from case that could toss climate suits against oil companies
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.
- 31Man sentenced to six years for explosives at Red Mass church▼Man gets 6 years in prison for taking explosives to church hosting annual Red Mass for justices
A man has been sentenced to six years in prison for bringing explosives to a church hosting the annual Red Mass, a service traditionally held for judges and justices before the legal year begins. The case drew wide wire coverage from outlets including ABC News and The Seattle Times, with attention focused on the target's connection to the judiciary and questions about security at the event.
- 32Justice Alito recuses from landmark Supreme Court climate case▼Supreme Court Justice Alito steps aside from landmark climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.
- 33Accused Murderer's AI-Generated Music Played in Court▼Accused Murderer Has His AI Music Played in Court
An accused murderer had music he created with artificial intelligence played during his court proceedings, a detail that has drawn widespread attention online. The unusual scene has sparked discussion about how courts handle defendants' personal materials and the growing presence of AI-generated art in unexpected settings, with many reacting to the surreal collision of criminal justice and new technology.
- 34DRC officials feared dead in Kenge aircraft crash●# RDC # justice # militaire # responsables # crash # avion # Kenge # DRC # military # justice # officials # aircraft # c
Military justice officials in the Democratic Republic of Congo are reported to have been killed in an aircraft crash near Kenge. Early reports, circulating mainly in French-language outlets, indicate the two most senior figures from the country's military justice system were among the victims. Details about the cause of the crash and the full list of those on board have not yet been confirmed by Congolese authorities.
- 35Kurt Olsen resigns from Justice Department, sources say▼Election denier Kurt Olsen has resigned from DOJ, sources say
Kurt Olsen, a lawyer known for promoting election denial claims, has resigned from the Department of Justice, according to sources cited by CBS News. The move raises questions about the department's staffing and its handling of election-related legal matters. Details on the timing or reason for his departure were not immediately disclosed.
- 36
The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.
- 37Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block transgender inmate ruling●Trump administration asks justices to block lower court order on transgender inmate policy
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to block a lower court order that halted its policy on transgender inmates, reportedly ending the housing of transgender women in women's federal prisons. The emergency application goes to the justices after a district court ruled against the policy. The request sets up another high-profile clash over transgender rights and presidential authority before the Court.
- 38Jack Smith testifies before Senate Judiciary Committee▼WATCH LIVE: Jack Smith testifies before Senate Judiciary as GOP targets past Trump probes
Former special counsel Jack Smith is testifying publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee as Republican lawmakers examine the Justice Department investigations he led into Donald Trump. The hearings, covered live by major outlets, are expected to focus on how the classified documents and election interference cases were conducted. The appearance marks a rare public account from Smith, who brought two federal criminal cases against Trump.
- 39Justice Alito Recuses Himself from Supreme Court Climate Case▼Justice Alito surprisingly recuses from climate change case ahead of new term
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a climate change case scheduled ahead of the new court term, an unexpected move that could affect the outcome if the remaining eight justices split. Recusals by sitting justices are rare and usually tied to potential conflicts of interest. The court has not explained the decision, and observers are watching closely as the case moves forward without him.
- 40Federal Court Finds D.C. Parole System Discriminates Against Disabled People▼Federal Court Rules Washington, D.C. Parole and Supervised Release System Discriminates Against People with Disabilities
A federal court has ruled that Washington, D.C.'s parole and supervised release system discriminates against people with disabilities. The decision, highlighted by the ACLU of the District of Columbia, finds that the system fails to accommodate disabled people under supervision. The ruling is being celebrated by disability rights advocates as a significant accountability victory and could force reforms in how D.C. supervises people returning from incarceration.