search
Institute for Justice
Trends
- 1US Sanctions Against ICC Raise European Sovereignty Fears●New U.S. sanctions against the ICC threaten European sovereignty
New US sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being framed as a threat to European sovereignty, since the Hague-based court sits in the Netherlands and depends on European cooperation. The measures could complicate EU support for international justice and raise questions about how Europe responds to US pressure on institutions it hosts and funds.
- 2Germany's foreign minister backs ICC despite Trump sanctions●Germany’s foreign minister visits the ICC, pledging full support despite Trump's sanctions
Germany's foreign minister visited the International Criminal Court in The Hague, pledging Berlin's full support for the institution despite US sanctions imposed under the Trump administration. The visit signals Germany's continued commitment to international justice, though it comes after Berlin also announced its own sanctions targeting ICC officials, creating a mixed picture of Europe's stance toward the court.
- 3UN effort to restore justice in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique▼Restoring the justice system in conflict-affected Cabo Delgado, Mozambique
The UN human rights office is highlighting efforts to rebuild the justice system in Cabo Delgado, a province in northern Mozambique battered by years of armed conflict. Courts, police and legal services were disrupted as violence displaced hundreds of thousands, leaving many residents without access to justice. Restoring these institutions is seen as a key step toward stabilising the region and protecting human rights.
- 4Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Allow Denying Hormones to Trans Inmates●Trump Administration Asks Justices to Allow It to Deny Hormones to Trans Inmates
The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it deny hormone therapy to transgender inmates in federal custody. The request escalates a legal fight over medical care for transgender prisoners, pitting claims of institutional discretion and public cost against court rulings that withholding such treatment violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices' response will shape how far correctional authorities must go in providing gender-affirming care behind bars.