Federal Court

A US judge has ruled against President Trump's ban blocking certain media outlets from White House access, overturning the exclusion in a significant rebuke to the administration's press restrictions. The decision is drawing wide attention as a test of press freedom and presidential power, with the story among the most discussed news items globally.

CNN has been allowed back into the White House after a federal judge paused the Trump administration's ban on the network from press access. The ruling temporarily blocks the administration from excluding CNN, restoring the network's ability to cover briefings and events. The dispute has drawn wide attention as a test of press freedom and the limits of presidential power over media access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states can use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states run voter rolls against the immigration-status system, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Supporters argue it protects election integrity, while critics warn it could wrongly purge eligible voters and raises privacy and accuracy concerns about the database.

Mexico has filed a lawsuit against Meta in federal court, accusing the company of human rights violations. News of the legal action, first reported by Milenio, has drawn significant attention as one of the most discussed stories internationally. The case marks a notable escalation between the Mexican government and the US tech giant, though the specific allegations behind the suit have not yet been detailed.

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from tying federal anti-terrorism grants to changes in election procedures. Under the policy, states seeking security funding would have been required to alter election rules, a condition critics said was coercive. The ruling halts the requirement while litigation proceeds, and comes amid ongoing disputes over federal authority over state-run elections.

A US judge has overturned a White House media ban imposed under Donald Trump, ruling against the administration's attempt to exclude certain news organisations from access. The decision is being widely reported by major outlets including BBC News and is drawing significant attention, with many seeing it as a key test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access.

News organisations CNN, MS NOW and Politico have asked a federal judge to extend a court order blocking a White House ban affecting them. The filing asks that the existing block remain in place while the legal challenge proceeds, keeping the administration's restrictions on hold. The dispute is being closely watched as a test of press access and First Amendment protections.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending case concerning climate change, meaning the justices will likely decide the matter with only eight members. His decision to recuse himself raises questions about how the court will handle a case with direct implications for federal climate policy.

A federal judge has blocked a Trump-era immigration rule that restricted eligibility for federally funded programs. The ruling stops the rule from being enforced while legal challenges proceed. Critics of the rule had argued it unfairly limited access to services for immigrant families, while supporters said it protected public resources. The decision is part of a broader wave of litigation over immigration policies introduced during the Trump administration.

A court has struck down conditions imposed by the Trump administration that tied anti-terrorism funding to election-related demands. The Brennan Center for Justice highlighted the ruling, which removes restrictions the administration had attached to grants meant to counter terrorism. The decision is being read as a rebuke of efforts to leverage federal security funding for electoral ends, and it restores access to the affected money for recipients.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico have asked a federal judge to stop President Trump from reviving a ban on their reporters' access to the White House. The news organisations are seeking a court order to preserve their access, arguing the move restricts press freedom. The dispute reopens a running battle between the administration and major US news outlets over media access.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it is not complying with a court order concerning press access. The development escalates a running legal dispute between the administration and news organisations over reporters' access to presidential events, and raises the prospect of further court action if the administration's response is deemed inadequate.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.

A federal judge has ruled that the federal government cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states as a way to force changes to how they administer elections. The decision limits the use of grant conditions tied to election policy and is being closely watched by state officials and election administrators concerned about federal overreach.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use a federal citizenship verification tool when checking whether people registering to vote are US citizens. The decision addresses concerns over noncitizen voting, but its practical effect is expected to be limited because changes come too close to the midterm elections to significantly alter voter rolls or procedures this cycle.

CNN has returned to the White House press pool after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore the network's access, which had been revoked earlier. The ruling marks a significant check on presidential control over press credentials, and the network is covering its reinstatement closely as debate continues over press freedom and the limits of executive power.

A federal judge has reinstated a $7 billion solar energy program intended to help low-income families access solar power, after the Trump administration scrapped it. The ruling restores funding under the program, though the administration is expected to appeal, leaving the program's future uncertain. The case has become part of the broader legal fight over the administration's efforts to unwind climate and clean-energy funding approved under prior legislation.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, reportedly involving housing or treatment rules in federal prisons. The emergency request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while litigation continues. The move is drawing attention from civil rights groups and supporters of the administration's prison policies.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it deny hormone therapy to transgender inmates in federal custody. The request escalates a legal fight over medical care for transgender prisoners, pitting claims of institutional discretion and public cost against court rulings that withholding such treatment violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices' response will shape how far correctional authorities must go in providing gender-affirming care behind bars.

A federal court has ruled that Washington, D.C.'s parole and supervised release system discriminates against people with disabilities. The decision, highlighted by the ACLU of the District of Columbia, finds the system failed to accommodate disabled people under supervision. Advocates say the ruling could force reforms in how parole conditions and support services are administered across the capital's criminal justice system.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, warning Attorney General Pam Bondi that contempt charges could follow if the department continues to withhold them. The order describes contempt as 'premature' for now, but signals the court is losing patience with the DOJ's stalling on the disclosures.

Immigrants' rights advocates, including the Asian Law Caucus, have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new executive order from President Trump on birthright citizenship. The suit argues the order is unlawful and targets efforts to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. Legal battles over the order are expected to move quickly through the courts.

A federal court ruling could undermine Wisconsin's law prohibiting AI-generated child sexual abuse material. The decision raises questions about whether the state statute can survive legal scrutiny, and may prompt lawmakers to revise the law. Observers are watching closely because similar bans exist in other states and could face comparable challenges if courts find the Wisconsin measure legally flawed.

A Cuban man has spent a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is now being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on detention authority. The report examines how federal immigration authorities have held him long-term despite legal questions about the limits of that power. His situation highlights the ongoing tension between immigration enforcement practices and constitutional limits on prolonged detention.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk. The ruling keeps in place the decision, which stems from Pentagon-related concerns about the firm and affects its standing in federal procurement. The designation is a significant blow for one of the country's leading artificial intelligence developers and raises questions about how similar rulings could shape the AI industry's relationship with government contracts.

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states as a way to force changes to election procedures. The decision blocks an attempt to pressure states through federal homeland security grants. The ruling limits the administration's use of funding conditions to influence how states run elections.

A federal judge has referred attorneys representing Donald Trump for potential disciplinary action in connection with a lawsuit involving the IRS. The referral suggests the judge believes the lawyers' conduct in the case may have violated professional standards. Details about the specific allegations and which attorneys are affected have not been made fully clear, and any disciplinary proceedings would be handled by the relevant bar authorities.

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a climate-related case involving the City of Boulder, Colorado, on Monday. The case centers on the city's efforts to hold energy companies accountable for climate change damages, a dispute that could shape how similar local climate lawsuits proceed across the country. Observers are watching closely for implications on federal versus local authority over climate policy.

A federal judge, Trump appointee Stephanie Gallagher, has held the Trump administration in contempt for deporting a man to El Salvador in violation of three court orders. The judge is ordering the government to return him. The ruling, reported by Politico legal correspondent Kyle Cheney, is drawing attention as part of the broader legal fight over the administration's immigration enforcement and compliance with court rulings.

The Cato Institute argues that the Supreme Court's decision to reauthorize the SAVE student loan repayment program is being overstated by some commentators, and that its practical impact is smaller than claimed. The SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment scheme for federal student borrowers, has been a frequent target of litigation and political debate, making any court action on it headline-worthy.