search
Federal Court
Trends
- 1
A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain reporters from White House press access. CNN reported the decision, which means the affected journalists must be allowed back into official briefings and events. Supporters of the ruling see it as a win for press freedom and the First Amendment, while critics of judicial intervention are pushing back. The case is one of several legal battles over the administration's treatment of the media.
- 2Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for citizenship checksβSupreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.
- 3CNN allowed back into White House after judge pauses media banβWatch CNN allowed back into WH after judge pauses Trump admin media ban
A federal judge has temporarily paused the Trump administration's ban barring CNN from the White House, and the network's reporters were allowed back into the building. The case has become a flashpoint in the broader fight over press access and the administration's efforts to penalize news outlets it views as unfavorable.
- 4
Donald Trump is being accused of defying a federal judge's order, according to reports circulating widely online. The alleged non-compliance has ignited criticism from critics who see it as a constitutional crisis, while supporters dismiss the claims as political grandstanding. Details of the specific order and any potential legal consequences for the former president remain limited, with legal observers closely watching whether courts will move to enforce compliance.
- 5Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped voter database for nowβSupreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.
- 6Supreme Court abortion vote shadows Susan Collins' Senate raceβSupreme Court vote shadows Maine Sen. Susan Collins in her first race after abortion rights decision
Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first campaign since the Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights, a decision her 2018 confirmation vote for Justice Brett Kavanaugh helped make possible. Abortion has become a central issue in her reelection race, with opponents arguing her vote enabled the rollback of Roe v. Wade, while Collins defends her record in a state that has backed abortion rights protections.
- 7Supreme Court lets states use SAVE tool for citizenship checksβCITIZENSHIP STATUS: U.S. Supreme Court says Indiana and other states can use SAVE tool; critics cite voting barriers
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Indiana and other states may use the federal SAVE database to verify citizenship status, a decision welcomed by state officials as a way to safeguard election records. Critics warn the ruling could create barriers for eligible voters, particularly those whose citizenship documents are not readily matched in the system, and argue it risks wrongful purges of voter rolls.
- 8Judge orders White House to answer for press order non-complianceβBREAKING: Judge orders White House to respond to non-compliance of press order by 12:30PM
A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it failed to comply with a court order concerning press access. The deadline sets up a rapid test of whether the administration will follow the ruling, and the story is drawing heavy attention as a fresh flashpoint in ongoing disputes between the administration and the press corps over First Amendment access.
- 9Federal court backs Pentagon's supply chain risk label for AnthropicβFederal court says Pentagon can label Anthropic a supply chain risk
A federal court has ruled that the Pentagon can designate Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, as a supply chain risk. The decision allows the Defense Department to maintain restrictions or scrutiny over Anthropic's role in federal contracting, raising questions about how AI firms are treated under national security procurement rules.
- 10EFF urges court to strike drone ban on filming immigration agentsβVacate a drone restriction that criminalized recording immigration agents
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration agents. The group argues the restriction blocks journalists and the public from documenting enforcement operations, raising First Amendment concerns. Commenters online are debating the balance between airspace security and the right to observe government agents at work.
- 11White House defies judge, bans CNN againβThe White House defies a federal judge's order and again bans CNN
The White House has revoked CNN's access once more, openly defying a federal judge's order that had barred the administration from excluding the network. The move escalates the standoff between the administration and the press over press freedom, and the network is expected to challenge the ban in court again.