AI regulators

Anthropic and OpenAI, two of the leading artificial intelligence companies, are publicly warning about the risks of advanced AI while simultaneously working to influence how the technology will be regulated. The story, widely picked up by US broadcasters and the AP, frames the companies as both sounding the alarm and seeking a hand in shaping the rules that will govern their own industry.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. His comments come as governments worldwide struggle to coordinate rules for rapidly advancing AI technology, with some comparing the challenge to historic superpower diplomacy over nuclear weapons.

Executives from Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning that advanced AI systems could pose risks to humanity, while simultaneously pushing to influence how the technology will be governed. Critics and observers are asking what the companies stand to gain from sounding the alarm, with some suggesting the warnings double as a bid for regulatory influence in a field the firms themselves dominate.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have appealed to the United Nations to establish oversight of the technology they helped create, warning of risks to humanity. The call puts pressure on international bodies, including the UN Security Council, to move faster on global AI governance as the technology advances.

Bill Gates warned that negotiating a global framework for artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argued that AI involves far more actors, commercial interests and rapid technological change, making international agreement harder to reach than it was for nuclear weapons controls.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreements on artificial intelligence will prove harder than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. He argues AI is developing faster and more diffusely than nuclear weapons technology, involving companies as well as states, making global regulation more difficult to coordinate. The comments add to ongoing debate about how governments should oversee rapidly advancing AI systems.

Bill Gates said that reaching global cooperation on artificial intelligence is 'more difficult' than negotiating agreements over nuclear weapons. The billionaire Microsoft co-founder argued that AI development is driven by many competing companies and countries, making coordination on safety and oversight more complicated than past arms control efforts. His remarks add to an ongoing debate among tech leaders and governments about how to regulate rapidly advancing AI technology.

Bill Gates has called on governments to put safeguards around the development of artificial intelligence. His comments add a prominent tech voice to the growing debate over whether AI should be regulated and how governments should respond to its rapid advance.

Bill Gates said creating a global framework for artificial intelligence would be more difficult to achieve than the nuclear arms limitations agreed during the Cold War. He argued that AI's rapid spread across commercial and civilian sectors makes international coordination far more complex than controlling weapons programs run by states. His comments come as governments worldwide debate how to regulate increasingly powerful AI systems.

Bill Gates said that getting countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence is more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. He argued that AI competition, particularly between the United States and China, makes international coordination on safety and regulation harder to achieve. His remarks add to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how to manage AI risks globally.

Bill Gates says that simply having an emergency 'kill switch' to shut down advanced artificial intelligence would not be enough to manage the technology's risks. His comments feed into a wider debate among tech leaders, researchers and regulators over how to keep increasingly powerful AI systems safe and under meaningful human control.

Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, is set to have dinner with President Donald Trump at the White House. The meeting brings together a leading figure in artificial intelligence with an administration that has been actively shaping US policy on AI regulation and development. Observers are watching for what the encounter could signal about the tech industry's relationship with the government.

A divide has emerged between United Nations bodies and Washington policymakers over how artificial intelligence should be governed, with leaders offering competing visions for oversight of the fast-moving technology. The disagreement highlights ongoing international tension over whether AI regulation should be coordinated globally or shaped primarily by national interests and domestic policy priorities.

Bill Gates says reaching international cooperation on artificial intelligence will be harder than nuclear arms negotiations were during the Cold War. He argues that competing commercial incentives make AI agreements more difficult to broker than weapons treaties. His remarks add to a growing debate over how governments should coordinate on AI safety and regulation across borders.

President Donald Trump said he met with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and again played down concerns about artificial intelligence. The confirmation puts the White House's relationship with one of the leading AI firms in focus, with Trump repeating his view that alarm over the technology is overstated. Observers are watching for signals on future US AI policy and regulation.

Nvidia's newly developed AI chips could be cleared for sale in the Chinese market, according to a report from MarketScreener. The potential move would mark a significant development in the ongoing tug-of-war between US export controls and China's demand for advanced semiconductors. Details about which chips are involved, under what conditions, and whether regulators on either side would approve the arrangement remain unspecified.

Bill Gates is calling on the US Congress to write artificial intelligence safeguards into law, arguing that lawmakers should establish rules for how the technology is developed and used. The appeal adds the Microsoft co-founder's voice to the growing debate in Washington over regulating AI, where legislators are weighing how to address risks without stifling innovation.

Donald Trump said he would have dinner with Anthropic's chief executive as the debate over artificial intelligence intensifies in Washington and beyond. The planned meeting draws attention to the growing contact between AI industry leaders and political figures, with observers watching for signals about how policy on AI regulation and development may shift.

Big Tech is betting its next wave of growth on smart glasses and AI-powered gadgets, but the products face mounting privacy challenges. Always-on cameras and microphones, combined with AI analysis of everything users see and hear, are drawing scrutiny from regulators and the public over surveillance risks and data collection.

Bill Gates says establishing global safeguards for artificial intelligence will be more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argues that unlike nuclear weapons, which were controlled by a small number of state actors, AI is being developed rapidly by competing companies and countries worldwide, making international agreement far harder to reach. The comparison has drawn wide coverage across multiple outlets and renewed debate over how AI development should be governed globally.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, argues in a Le Monde interview that artificial intelligence is ultimately software and can therefore be controlled. He is pushing back against fears that advanced AI is an uncontrollable force, framing the technology as something that can be governed and regulated like any other software.

Walmart says neither the company nor its AI shopping assistant uses customers' personal information to set prices, pushing back on concerns about personalized or surveillance-based pricing at the retail giant. The statement comes amid growing scrutiny of how retailers deploy AI tools and shopper data. It remains unclear whether regulators or consumer groups are investigating the practice.

China is considering measures to make open-weight artificial intelligence models less dangerous as risks from the technology grow, according to the South China Morning Post. The discussion focuses on how freely available model weights could be misused, and what safeguards Beijing might apply. The report comes amid intensifying global debate over regulating powerful AI systems.

Questions are being raised about whether advanced AI systems could help people develop biological weapons, and how serious that risk actually is. The debate touches on whether AI models could provide meaningful uplift for bioweapons, what safeguards labs and companies should put in place, and how regulators should respond. Experts remain divided, with some warning of catastrophic potential and others calling current fears overstated.

US states are moving ahead of the federal government on regulating artificial intelligence safety, with state legislatures drafting and passing their own AI rules. The trend highlights a growing gap in Washington, where comprehensive AI legislation has stalled, leaving individual states to set standards on issues like transparency, bias and consumer protection.

Lawmakers in Washington are facing renewed pressure to act on artificial intelligence safety, as concern grows over the risks posed by rapidly advancing AI systems. Bloomberg reports that Congress is being pressed to clarify its position on regulation, with debates intensifying over how to balance innovation against potential harms. The issue continues to divide policymakers and industry leaders alike.

An NPR report says AI assessors conclude that current science cannot yet support the safety measures the public wants from artificial intelligence. The finding highlights a gap between expectations for AI safeguards and what research can actually verify, renewing debate among scientists and policymakers over how to regulate systems whose risks remain poorly understood.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence while working to influence how the technology will be governed. The two leading AI companies are sounding the alarm on safety concerns at the same time as they seek a role in deciding how AI systems are controlled, raising questions about whether the industry should help write its own regulations.

The chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic have been called to appear before an Australian parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence. Lawmakers in Australia are examining the risks and regulation of advanced AI systems, and the summons signals Canberra's interest in holding leading US AI developers publicly accountable. The move adds to growing global scrutiny of AI companies by governments and regulators.

A US appeals court has upheld the Pentagon's designation of AI company Anthropic as posing a risk, a decision with potential implications for how the US government classifies and works with leading artificial intelligence firms. The ruling confirms the Defense Department's assessment, though details of the court's reasoning and Anthropic's response remain limited in initial reports.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is set to attend a dinner with President Donald Trump at the White House. The meeting brings together one of the leading figures in artificial intelligence and the US administration, drawing attention given ongoing debates over AI regulation, safety policy, and the industry's growing political ties in Washington.

Industry commentary argues that Isaac Asimov's famous Three Laws of Robotics, while culturally influential, are not an adequate framework for ensuring the safety of modern robotics and artificial intelligence. The discussion comes as real-world AI and robotic systems grow more complex and autonomous, prompting calls for practical safety standards, regulation, and engineering safeguards that go beyond science fiction-era rules.

US President Donald Trump has invited Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, to a private dinner at the White House. The reported invitation signals growing engagement between the administration and leading artificial intelligence firms. Anthropic, one of the leading AI labs behind the Claude models, has previously urged Washington to regulate advanced AI, making the outreach closely watched in tech and policy circles.

Bill Gates said reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be harder than negotiating nuclear arms limits. He suggested AI is developing faster and is more diffuse than nuclear technology, making a shared global framework difficult. His remarks are drawing attention in debates over how governments should govern AI.

Donald Trump has said he does not worry about artificial intelligence turning against people, dismissing concerns that AI could 'go rogue'. His comments came as governments and industry leaders continue to debate the risks of rapidly advancing AI systems. Reactions are likely to be divided between those who see the remarks as cavalier and supporters who view them as typical confidence in American innovation.

President Trump is meeting with Anthropic's chief executive amid fresh reports of AI security breaches. The reported intrusions have intensified safety concerns around advanced artificial intelligence systems, and the meeting is being read as a sign of growing engagement between the White House and leading AI developers on regulation, security, and industry safeguards.