AI regulators

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is scheduled to brief the United Nations Security Council next week on artificial intelligence, according to Reuters. The session would place the head of one of the world's leading AI companies directly before the body charged with international peace and security, as governments weigh how to regulate advanced AI. Details of the briefing's agenda and who requested it were not immediately available.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks of advanced artificial intelligence while lobbying to influence how the technology will be regulated. The simultaneous safety appeals from the two leading AI companies are drawing attention, with commentators debating whether the warnings reflect genuine concern or an effort to steer incoming rules in their favor.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will prove harder than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argues AI is developing faster and more diffusely than nuclear technology, making coordinated global rules difficult. His comments come as governments worldwide struggle to agree on oversight of rapidly advancing AI systems.

World leaders are divided over how to govern artificial intelligence, with competing approaches emerging at the United Nations and in Washington. Tech Policy Press reports that the split reflects broader disagreements over whether AI oversight should be led through international cooperation or shaped primarily by national policy interests, a debate that is increasingly shaping global tech policy discussions.

Singapore has proposed a United Nations framework convention on artificial intelligence safety, according to the Straits Times. The proposal would create an international treaty framework aimed at coordinating how countries manage AI risks. The initiative reflects growing calls for global governance of advanced AI, with the UN seen as the natural venue for such an agreement.

Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, is set to have dinner with President Donald Trump at the White House. The meeting brings together a leading figure in artificial intelligence with an administration that has been actively shaping US policy on AI regulation and development. Observers are watching for what the encounter could signal about the tech industry's relationship with the government.

At the United Nations, world leaders are framing the risks of artificial intelligence in starkly different ways. Some warn of autonomous 'killer robots' on the battlefield, while others point to the longer-term threat of 'super intelligence' beyond human control. The divide highlights the challenge of crafting international AI governance, with countries prioritising different dangers as they push for new rules on the fast-moving technology.

Chinese regulators are considering letting ByteDance and Alibaba purchase new Nvidia chips, according to a report by The Information picked up by Reuters. The potential approval would mark a shift in Beijing's stance on access to advanced US semiconductors amid ongoing trade tensions and export restrictions, and is drawing attention from tech and markets watchers.

President Trump said the United States will not restrain artificial intelligence development, speaking after a meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. His comments came despite calls from some governments and experts for international safeguards on advanced AI. The statement signals the US intends to keep pushing AI innovation at full speed, even as other countries push for coordinated global oversight.

Bill Gates has added his voice to growing calls for safeguards on artificial intelligence, including new legislation to govern the technology. The move puts the Microsoft co-founder alongside other prominent tech figures urging governments to set rules as AI tools spread rapidly. The intervention adds weight to the debate over how regulators should balance innovation with risks from powerful AI systems.

Bill Gates said that reaching global cooperation on artificial intelligence is 'more difficult' than negotiating agreements over nuclear weapons. The billionaire Microsoft co-founder argued that AI development is driven by many competing companies and countries, making coordination on safety and oversight more complicated than past arms control efforts. His remarks add to an ongoing debate among tech leaders and governments about how to regulate rapidly advancing AI technology.

Bill Gates warned that negotiating a global framework for artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. He argued that AI involves far more actors, commercial interests and rapid technological change, making international agreement harder to reach than it was for nuclear weapons controls.

Walmart says neither the company nor its AI shopping assistant uses customers' personal information to set prices, pushing back on concerns about personalized or surveillance-based pricing at the retail giant. The statement comes amid growing scrutiny of how retailers deploy AI tools and shopper data. It remains unclear whether regulators or consumer groups are investigating the practice.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have urged the UN Security Council to take collective action against the security risks posed by increasingly powerful AI systems. They stressed that potential global threats from the technology require international cooperation and coordinated regulation, warning that no single country can manage the challenge alone. The appeal adds to mounting pressure on global institutions to establish binding rules for advanced AI development.

Bill Gates said creating a global framework for artificial intelligence would be more difficult to achieve than the nuclear arms limitations agreed during the Cold War. He argued that AI's rapid spread across commercial and civilian sectors makes international coordination far more complex than controlling weapons programs run by states. His comments come as governments worldwide debate how to regulate increasingly powerful AI systems.

Donald Trump has confirmed he met with Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, and repeated his scepticism about warnings surrounding artificial intelligence. The meeting is notable given Anthropic has been among the loudest voices cautioning about advanced AI risks, while Trump continues to downplay such fears as he shapes US technology policy.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than the arms control negotiations of the nuclear era. He argues AI develops faster and more diffusely than nuclear weapons did, making global rules harder to negotiate and enforce. His remarks are drawing attention as governments worldwide debate how to oversee rapidly advancing AI technology.

Bill Gates said developing artificial intelligence without regulation would be 'completely irresponsible'. His comments come amid ongoing debate over how governments should oversee rapidly advancing AI systems, with tech leaders divided on how much oversight is needed and how quickly rules should be imposed.

Chinese state media says the United States shares responsibility with China for managing artificial intelligence, arguing the world's two leading AI powers must coordinate on oversight of the fast-moving technology. The statement comes amid ongoing US-China tensions over tech export controls and AI governance, and is being watched as a signal of Beijing's positioning ahead of potential international AI regulation talks.

Bill Gates said reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be harder than negotiating nuclear arms limits. He suggested AI is developing faster and is more diffuse than nuclear technology, making a shared global framework difficult. His remarks are drawing attention in debates over how governments should govern AI.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence while working to influence how the technology will be governed. The two leading AI companies are sounding the alarm on safety concerns at the same time as they seek a role in deciding how AI systems are controlled, raising questions about whether the industry should help write its own regulations.

Bill Gates said that getting countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence is more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. He argued that AI competition, particularly between the United States and China, makes international coordination on safety and regulation harder to achieve. His remarks add to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how to manage AI risks globally.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have appealed to the United Nations, asking international bodies to establish controls on the technology they themselves helped create. The call frames AI risk as a matter for humanity as a whole, arguing that safety standards cannot be left to individual companies or countries. It renews debate over whether global institutions can move fast enough to regulate a rapidly advancing field.

OpenAI has paused model training following a further AI incident, according to the claim being circulated. Commenters say the series of problems at the company keeps growing and are asking when regulators or the industry will act. The report is being shared alongside references to other AI players including Anthropic, Meta, Google and Grok, framing the pause as part of a broader pattern of AI safety concerns.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulations will be more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations, arguing governments have no precedent for policing a technology evolving this fast. He is calling for global coordination on AI safety, and commentators are debating whether his comparison is realistic given how divided countries already are on AI rules.

Australian lawmakers have formally summoned the chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic to appear before a parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence. The summons, reported by Al Jazeera, means the heads of the two leading AI companies must testify rather than attend voluntarily. It signals Australia's determination to scrutinise how advanced AI systems are developed and governed, and comes as governments worldwide weigh regulation of the fast-moving technology.

Anthropic and OpenAI, two of the leading artificial intelligence companies, are publicly warning about safety risks from advanced AI systems while also lobbying to influence how the technology will be regulated. Critics and observers are weighing whether the companies' alarm reflects genuine concern or an effort to shape upcoming rules in their own favour. The debate comes as governments worldwide move toward new AI oversight frameworks.

Bill Gates has added his voice to growing demands for artificial intelligence safeguards, arguing that self-regulation is not enough. His intervention aligns him with other tech leaders and policymakers urging governments to introduce binding rules for AI development. The statement is being widely reported as a notable shift, given Gates's long-standing optimism about technology's benefits.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about AI safety risks while simultaneously working to influence how the technology will be regulated. The report highlights a growing tension: the leading AI firms are both raising alarms about powerful systems and positioning themselves as authorities on control measures. Critics and observers are debating whether companies building the technology should have such a large say in the rules that govern it.

A New York Times report argues that artificial intelligence is advancing faster than governments can regulate it, leaving lawmakers increasingly behind on oversight, safety rules and public policy. The piece examines the widening gap between the pace of AI innovation and the slow machinery of legislation, a tension currently at the center of debates in Washington, Brussels and other capitals over how to govern powerful AI systems.

Major AI laboratories say the scenario in which AI models gain the ability to improve themselves autonomously is approaching. The claim, reported by ABC News, revives debate among researchers and policymakers about how soon recursive self-improvement could arrive and what safety measures would be needed. Observers are weighing whether current models show early signs of this capability or whether lab statements reflect competitive positioning.

Dario Amadei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, is calling for stronger government regulation of artificial intelligence, according to an exclusive interview with ABC News. The appeal from a leading AI developer adds to a growing debate over how quickly governments should move to impose rules on advanced AI systems, and it is drawing attention across the tech industry and policy circles.