AI professionals

A health expert is warning that artificial intelligence chatbots cannot replace doctors, as more people turn to tools like ChatGPT for medical advice. The caution comes amid growing use of AI for health questions, with experts stressing that chatbots can mislead, miss serious conditions and should complement rather than substitute professional medical care.

The New York Times reports that as artificial intelligence helps law firms complete work faster, clients are questioning why they should keep paying traditional billable-hour rates. The piece explores growing demands for discounts and new pricing models, as firms balance productivity gains from AI against a fee structure built on time spent.

Some members of Gen Z are deliberately relearning touch typing, a skill skipped by many who grew up on phones and tablets. They say faster, more accurate typing helps them write better prompts for AI chatbots and gives them an edge in office jobs where quick keyboard work still matters. The trend highlights a gap between mobile-first digital natives and the keyboard-heavy demands of professional work.

Cybersecurity commentary is circling a CSO Online piece arguing that AI-powered malware has effectively eliminated the human operator from the attack loop, letting malicious software make its own decisions without direct human control. Security professionals are sharing and debating the claim, with some treating fully autonomous AI malware as a genuine milestone in offensive capability rather than hype.

Health experts are weighing in on the growing number of people turning to artificial intelligence chatbots for medical guidance. As AI tools become embedded in everyday life, questions are mounting about their accuracy, safety and whether users can distinguish reliable information from harmful advice. The debate highlights the gap between AI's convenience and the need for professional medical consultation.

A longtime film industry concept artist, who spent his career helping directors visualise their movies, has now directed a film of his own using artificial intelligence tools. The story highlights how generative AI is opening directing opportunities to behind-the-scenes artists, while also raising questions about the technology's growing role in filmmaking.

NFL running back Saquon Barkley is investing up to $500,000 in individual startups, focusing on artificial intelligence and Bitcoin as he builds wealth for life after football. The move highlights a growing trend of professional athletes putting earnings into technology ventures rather than traditional investments, drawing attention to how sports stars prepare financially for retirement.

Laboratory management professionals are highlighting the need for formal biosafety oversight when artificial intelligence systems direct wet-lab experiments. The concern is that AI-designed protocols could bypass traditional risk review, creating biological safety and security gaps. Discussion centres on updating institutional biosafety committees and lab protocols to cover AI-generated experiment designs before they are carried out in facilities.

A new analysis argues that artificial intelligence is on track to become a standard safety tool in the logistics industry by 2030. The piece suggests AI applications such as predictive monitoring, hazard detection and driver-assistance systems could move from optional technology to common practice across warehousing and freight operations. Industry safety professionals are weighing how quickly adoption might happen and what it would mean for workplace protections.

A recorded talk from BSides Luxembourg 2026 titled "AI In Cybersecurity: How Can We Make Best Use Of It?" by security professional Diana Waithanji has been published online. The conference says recordings from the track and its other villages are available in a public archive, letting security practitioners watch sessions on how artificial intelligence can be applied defensively and operationally in cybersecurity work.

Commentators are arguing that hospitals should rely on nurses' professional judgment rather than adopting unproven artificial intelligence tools in patient care. The piece warns that AI systems being introduced into healthcare have not been adequately validated, and that replacing or overriding clinical expertise with such technology could put patients at risk. The debate reflects broader concerns about how quickly AI is being deployed in medicine without sufficient evidence or oversight.